Resources and publications
Ngā rauemi, ngā tānga kōrero
Use the filters to narrow your search. For each search, you can only tick one format type, one fund type and one resource type.
Use the filters to narrow your search. For each search, you can only tick one format type, one fund type and one resource type.
Filter by
Filter by
Showing 371 - 380 of 868 results
-
WDC Presentation 26 September 2019
Published 27 September 2019Reform of Vocational Education:Workforce Development Councils
Information for employers and industry groups -
PBRF-panel-results-all-panels-2006.xls
Published 26 September 2019Spreadsheet with statistics from the peer review panels in the 2006 Quality Evaluation for the Performance-Based Research Fund.
-
PBRF Panel nominations process guidelines update Jan 2018
Published 26 September 2019Performance Based Research Fund Peer Review Panel nomination and selection process for the 2018 Quality Evaluation, document updated January 2018
-
PBRF No 9 Review of TEO audit process
Published 26 September 2019Summarises the sector responses to the PBRF Sector Reference Group’s proposed framework for auditing data submitted by tertiary education organisations.
-
PBRF historical infographic Oct 2018
Published 26 September 2019Infographic illustrating the PBRF historical quality evaluation results - Oct 2018
-
PBRF Evaluating Research Excellence the 2003 assessment
Published 26 September 2019PBRF Evaluating Research Excellence the 2003 assessment
-
PBRF Audit Methodology 2012 Revised 18Jun12
Published 26 September 2019Sets out the audit approach that we developed to assist participating tertiary education organisations prepare for the 2012 Performance-Based Research Fund Quality Evaluation.
-
PBRF AR 2010
Published 26 September 2019Annual report for the Performance-Based Research Fund, 2010
-
PBRF AR 2008 for web
Published 26 September 2019Annual report for the Performance-Based Research Fund, 2008
-
Appendix to PBRF assessment framework consultation paper No 8 Part 1
Published 26 September 2019Covers guidelines for selecting a peer review panel, from the 2012 Quality evaluation.